One of the underlying concepts of “Quality” is fitness for use. A 2×4 makes a bad baseball bat but a quality wall frame. A Louisville Slugger makes a quality bat but a bad wall frame. In our case, a fiberglass RIB didn’t make for a quality dinghy experience. Continue reading
Posted in 2011
Ever had a fuel fill belch/spatter diesel in a bubbling petro-reflux onto deck and crew?
We we have and know others who have as well. Since 2009, I have been looking at ways to deal with this phenomenon and thanks to a bartender who worked in the same chemistry lab as I did 40+ years ago, I think we’ve figured out a solution that works for us. At least, over five trials, it hasn’t happened again. We swirled the fuel, the way my friend taught me to swirl bottles and flasks to get them to drain faster. We made $1.79 an hour cleaning lab-ware in 1969.
- We bought a no-screen six quart funnel (Ace, 205 Monck Street in Brunswick GA)
- We had a spare screw-in deck pump-out fitting to match our deck fill
- We removed all put an inch of the funnel spout
- With the funnel inverted we seated the screw-in fitting on the funnel spout, centered and threads up, and bonded the two using fuel tank sealant
- This we set aside for a few days to truly harden
- We wrap the funnel top with a band of fuel absorbent bilge pad to extend the upper edge about 6 inches and secure it
- We screw the funnel into the fuel fill to just finger-tight making sure to use the gasket provided [we twist the fitting not the funnel]
- We pump fuel from the nozzle into the funnel 30° to 45° below horizontal such that it swirls around, down and into the spout.
- This creates an air-throated maelstrom/cyclone effect which allows the air to come freely up the center without belching
- Threading in the funnel prevents belching between the funnel and fill pipe
- We adjust the fuel flow to keep the central air column from closing.
We have been able to double and triple our refueling rates with zero spills and spatters this way. We have to be mindful we can get to a “fill” faster, though. And yes, the tanks are equipped with theoretically sufficient vents.
It costs a bit but is much cheaper than the pollution fines.
Cruising is ultimately about individuals accepting accountability for their own choices. You’ll see that comment in our disclaimer. In a recent comment dialog on Attainable Adventure Cruising, the subject of inflatable life-jackets has received a lot of useful exploration. In the course of participating, I started rethinking the issue of “choices.” With equipment in mind, there are:
- Caveat Emptor–you are on your own with respect to what the market provides.
- Lightly guided/constrained choice–government or private groups assist through testing (UL, etc), and specification (USCG, SAE, IEEE, etc).
- Tightly guided/constrained choice–the government defines the range of choice, but no choice remains an option (EPIRBs).
- Quod est Lex — it is the law — government defines the range of choice and enforces it with penalties (no choice option only available to scoff-laws).
When making choices, humans tend to fall between two extremes with a peak in the middle. Near zero on the axis is how little can I do to meet the most probable need (called sufficing). On the far end is minimizing one’s maximum regret (sort of a belt + suspenders/braces + helium balloon approach.) Both of these ends tend to be risk tolerance constrained choices.
The middle causes the doubt. The middle tends to be a muddle of the entrepreneurial “new thing” and the enduring “good enough for my Da/Ma, good enough for me.”
Three things to remember when navigating this muddle.
- Statistically speaking, cruising involves a small, heterogeneous sample set with high anecdotal content (relative to automobiles & airlines for example). Because anecdotes tend to be more interesting than data, we tend to listen to the best stories rather than look at the data all the way back to its accumulation rules.
- Coincidence and Causation frequently sleep in separate bunks. Look for the confounding variable. One can often drill a very shallow well to get a gusher of “not so fast.” Because there are more influences on the outcome than are being reported or collected, our minds tend to fill in the blanks according to our pre-existing biases. The most frequent error is the apples and oranges fallacy.
- A product or a service sits on the tip of a pyramid. Its corners are business reality of the provider/market, provider product/service focus, endurability of the support infrastructure, and government involvement. Because we are bombarded with new, New, NEW, we tend to be herded in the direction of non-durable products/suppliers. & Because the current business environment favors consolidation, many of the market’s suppliers are diluting their focus.
Consistent with the disclaimer, I wouldn’t even attempt to suggest an approach, but I will say:
- If a highly hyped product has no statistics, or they won’t share them, we walk away–if we are going to be someone’s market development experiment, we have to include early/frequent product/service failure as an acceptable outcome.
- If the statistics jump to a connection between widely separated or potentially confounded data, we ask to see more. If more isn’t available, we often loop back to #1 above.
- For any product that may require service or spares, we tend to look for suppliers who have a high probability of survival. We would rather have fewer features and benefits in favor of endurance between retrofit, than smokin’ hot performance that can’t be fixed or supplied or serviced should the need arise.
- Finally, we believe it best to buy from suppliers who have more than a business commitment to their product. Usually, that can only be determined by a visit to the company. (Boat Shows are Shows, not necessarily Tells.)
The system is up and generating amps. But not very many thanks to the overcast. There are a few finishing touches required but those can wait till spring. Now to begin monitoring performance…
Posted in 2010
Tagged Solar, Systems
As with all modifications, this one has been a few steps forward and a few back. Fabricating the plates to support the panels and the wiring went fairly smoothly, and I must recommend Online Metals.com. The pieces I ordered came quickly and precisely cut so that I could focus on fabrication rather than clean up. It was very pleasant to have each plate fit as it should after having mass drilled and trimmed the six of them.
Of course, the plate-clamp arrangement for the forward and aft panels had to be custom fit on the boat with the panels in place. This was not easy, and the heat reflected from the panels and the dark blue Sunbrella Bimini, made work between 1300 and 1700 unwise. So this relatively straight forward task took me the better part of two and a half days.*
The pictures show the results. But now, it all has to be disconnected (though not removed) to do the wiring properly. I still believe we will be off-grid by the time we winterize, and truly hope to get at least a few days under sail with the panels in place so I can understand any further reinforcement issues with the frame. My fun meter is still in a good spot, but the $$ meter continues to climb beyond my initial estimate.
*In 94°F weather, the underside of the exposed Sunbrella was 146°F. In the area shaded by the solar panels it was 109°F. While still warm, this will help with cockpit temps. I have some foil and bubble insulation I have been thinking about sewing into canvas packets we can put under the heated Sunbrella to further reduce temps. It’s not a high priority…